SecAI+ level · Domain 4.0 AI Governance, Risk, and Compliance · 19% of the mapped exam

4.3 Summarize the impact of compliance on business use and development of AI.

8 topics · 5 quiz questions

AI regulation and standards are maturing quickly. Know the main frameworks, what they expect, and how corporate policy turns them into daily rules.

Regulations and standards

European Union (EU) AI Act
EU law that classifies AI by risk: prohibited practices (such as social scoring), high-risk systems with strict requirements (risk management, data quality, documentation, human oversight, conformity assessment), transparency duties for systems like chatbots and deepfakes, and obligations for general-purpose AI models. Applies to providers and deployers serving the EU market.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) standards
The OECD AI Principles: inclusive growth and well-being, human rights and fairness, transparency and explainability, robustness and safety, and accountability. Adopted by many governments as a baseline.
ISO AI standards
International standards such as ISO/IEC 42001 (AI management system, certifiable), ISO/IEC 23894 (AI risk management) and ISO/IEC 22989 (AI concepts and terminology).
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF)
Voluntary US framework organised into four functions: Govern, Map, Measure and Manage, with a generative AI profile. Widely used to structure AI risk programmes.

Corporate policies

Sanctioned vs. unsanctioned
Approved AI tools that meet security and contract requirements versus tools staff use without approval (shadow AI). Policy should offer good sanctioned options so people do not need unsanctioned ones.
Private vs. public models
Private (self-hosted or enterprise-contracted) models keep data under your control and terms; public consumer models may retain or train on inputs.
Sensitive data governance
Rules on which data classifications may be used with which models, plus redaction, logging and retention requirements.

Third-party compliance evaluations

Third-party compliance evaluations
Assessing AI vendors: security reports (SOC 2, ISO 27001/42001), data use and retention terms, model training on your data, sub-processors, and contractual rights to audit.

Check your understanding

Loading quiz…

Original CoreQ Academy material, mapped to objective 4.3 of the publicly available CompTIA SecAI+ CY0-001 exam objectives (Exam objectives V1, document version 1.1). Not affiliated with or endorsed by CompTIA. Contains no exam questions.